GEO for SaaS and AI tools selling overseas: a practical checklist

Citeshine helps brands find and fix what AI gets wrong about their products. We’re especially strong with SaaS and AI tools selling overseas. We test global AI engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini) and Chinese ones (DeepSeek, Doubao, Kimi). Start with a free sample check, upgrade to the full $99 audit when you want the fix list.

This checklist is for SaaS and AI-tool teams selling to international buyers. The goal: when someone asks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini or Claude (or DeepSeek, Doubao and Kimi, for Chinese-speaking buyers) “what tool should I use for X?”, your product is mentioned, described correctly, and ideally cited.

Our rule: every step should be verifiable. Where we have no public source, we label the item as our recommendation, not a fact.

GEO six-step flow: baseline, crawlers, entity, content, third parties, re-test
Six-step overview (schematic). Time estimates are rough guesses, not measured data.

Step 0: Measure a baseline (half a day)

If you change things without measuring, you will never know what worked.

Tools: the open-source citeshine-audit (MIT; our published baseline used its ChatGPT web engine; API engines for OpenAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Kimi, Grok, Claude and Gemini are implemented but not yet used in a published run), a paid monitoring platform, or a spreadsheet.

Citeshine published baseline schematic: 0/11 generic mentions, wrong description when named
Schematic. Numbers are from our published 2026-10-13 logged-out ChatGPT web case study (n=1), not a new run and not an extrapolation.

Our own baseline: on 2026-10-13, logged-out ChatGPT web, 13 prompts once each. Citeshine was mentioned in 0 of 11 generic questions. Asked by name, ChatGPT described our domain as a 2021 Shopify phone-case store. Full write-up: case study.


Step 1: Let AI crawlers in (1 day)


Step 2: Tell AI who you are (1–2 days)

AI assembles its picture of you from many sources. Inconsistent or legacy information leads to wrong answers.


Step 3: Publish content AI can quote (ongoing)


Step 4: Show up in third-party sources (ongoing)

In our 2026-10-13 test, when ChatGPT recommended GEO providers, its source chips mixed providers’ own sites with many roundups, media articles and third-party lists. In two answers listing Chinese GEO teams, every chip was a third-party media source (one sample, treat it as a hint).


Step 5: Re-test with the same ruler (every 2–4 weeks)

Measure, fix, re-test loop schematic
Loop schematic: if you change the ruler, results are not comparable.

Don’ts


One-page version

StepOutputTime (rough)
0 BaselineQuestion set, raw answers, countsHalf a day
1 Crawler accessrobots.txt, WAF rules, readable HTML1 day
2 Entity infoCanonical description, JSON-LD, domain-history note1–2 days
3 Quotable contentCategory pages, comparisons, FAQ, pricing, docsOngoing
4 Third-party sourcesDirectories, communities, open source, real reviewsOngoing
5 Re-testComparison report on the same question setEvery 2–4 weeks

Time estimates are rough guesses, not measured data.


Want someone to run Step 0 for you? Citeshine is especially strong with SaaS and AI tools selling overseas. We check global and Chinese AI engines and start with what they get wrong about you: trace each error to its source, run every prompt multiple times, and re-test on the same set after fixes. The audit is free. If we work together afterwards, you pay a monthly base fee, plus a bonus only if a re-test shows the metric reached the target we agreed on in writing: citeshine.com/audit. Get seen by AI.

Start with a free sample check

ChatGPT only, up to 5 buyer questions, and a short summary. Upgrade to the full $99 audit when you want all six engines and the written fix list.

Request the free sample Compare the two Request the $99 Starter